[PATCH] Fix markup in sntp.8

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[PATCH] Fix markup in sntp.8

Steve Kargl
Index: sntp.8
===================================================================
--- sntp.8      (revision 303492)
+++ sntp.8      (working copy)
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@
 more than enough for a unicast response.  If \fBsntp\fP is
 only waiting for a broadcast response a longer timeout is
 likely needed.
-.It  Fl \-wait , " Fl \-no\-wait"
+.It  Fl \-wait , Fl \-no\-wait
 Wait for pending replies (if not setting the time).
 The \fIno\-wait\fP form will disable the option.
 This option is enabled by default.

--
Steve
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [PATCH] Fix markup in sntp.8

Steve Kargl
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:47:37PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:

> Index: sntp.8
> ===================================================================
> --- sntp.8      (revision 303492)
> +++ sntp.8      (working copy)
> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@
>  more than enough for a unicast response.  If \fBsntp\fP is
>  only waiting for a broadcast response a longer timeout is
>  likely needed.
> -.It  Fl \-wait , " Fl \-no\-wait"
> +.It  Fl \-wait , Fl \-no\-wait
>  Wait for pending replies (if not setting the time).
>  The \fIno\-wait\fP form will disable the option.
>  This option is enabled by default.
>

Does freebsd-doc handle documentation patches?

--
Steve
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [PATCH] Fix markup in sntp.8

Benjamin Kaduk-4
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Steve Kargl wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:47:37PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > Index: sntp.8
> > ===================================================================
> > --- sntp.8      (revision 303492)
> > +++ sntp.8      (working copy)
> > @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@
> >  more than enough for a unicast response.  If \fBsntp\fP is
> >  only waiting for a broadcast response a longer timeout is
> >  likely needed.
> > -.It  Fl \-wait , " Fl \-no\-wait"
> > +.It  Fl \-wait , Fl \-no\-wait
> >  Wait for pending replies (if not setting the time).
> >  The \fIno\-wait\fP form will disable the option.
> >  This option is enabled by default.
> >
>
> Does freebsd-doc handle documentation patches?

We do handle them, we are just sometimes slow about it.

-Ben
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [PATCH] Fix markup in sntp.8

Benjamin Kaduk-4
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Aug 2016, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:47:37PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > Index: sntp.8
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- sntp.8      (revision 303492)
> > > +++ sntp.8      (working copy)
> > > @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@
> > >  more than enough for a unicast response.  If \fBsntp\fP is
> > >  only waiting for a broadcast response a longer timeout is
> > >  likely needed.
> > > -.It  Fl \-wait , " Fl \-no\-wait"
> > > +.It  Fl \-wait , Fl \-no\-wait
> > >  Wait for pending replies (if not setting the time).
> > >  The \fIno\-wait\fP form will disable the option.
> > >  This option is enabled by default.
> > >
> >
> > Does freebsd-doc handle documentation patches?
>
> We do handle them, we are just sometimes slow about it.

Getting around towards doing so, I note that this file is from a vendor
tree, and the bug is still present in
https://github.com/ntp-project/ntp/blob/master/sntp/sntp.mdoc.in .
Unfortunately, http://bugs.ntp.org/enter_bug.cgi wants me to create a
login; adding cy and delphij to see if either of them already have one and
would be able to report the bug upstream.

My understanding is that now that we're in subversion intsead of CVS,
applying a local patch to a file from the vendor tree is not a huge
burden, but I'm inclined to wait a bit to add a local patch so we can see
how responsive upstream is.

Sorry about the (further) delay...

-Ben
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"