freebsd-gecko

This forum is an archive for the mailing list freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org (more options) Messages posted here will be sent to this mailing list.
This is a forum about Gecko applications using FreeBSD. Discussion centers around Gecko Ports applications, their installation, their development and their support within FreeBSD.
1234 ... 41
Topics (3682)
Replies Last Post Views
[Bug 239914] www/firefox: 11.3R: Firefox 68.0.1 ignores at least 2 prefs by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239914] www/firefox: 11.3R: Firefox 68.0.1 ignores at least 2 prefs by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 224471] [PATCH] bsd.gecko.mk: add conditional for ccache by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 224471] [PATCH] bsd.gecko.mk: add conditional for ccache by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 224471] [PATCH] bsd.gecko.mk: add conditional for ccache by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 232183] www/firefox: r481071 of Mk/bsd.gecko.mk inhibits the use of ccache by absolute pathnames by bugzilla-noreply
7
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 224471] [PATCH] bsd.gecko.mk: add conditional for ccache by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 224471] [PATCH] bsd.gecko.mk: add conditional for ccache by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239873] www/firefox and mail/thunderbird don't like the new ASLR "stackgap" feature by bugzilla-noreply
1
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238087] www/firefox: update to 68.0 (currently, Beta phase) by bugzilla-noreply
13
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 206980] www/firefox: 44.0 port build fails with WRKDIRPREFIX set by bugzilla-noreply
6
by bugzilla-noreply
16 августа ПРИГЛАШАЕМ ИЗДАТЬ ВАШУ СТАТЬЮ В В ТЕКУЩЕМ НОМЕРЕ by редакция журнала
0
by редакция журнала
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
Problem reports for gecko@FreeBSD.org that need special attention by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 235666] www/firefox fails to build with python-3.6 by bugzilla-noreply
5
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 232701] www/firefox multiprocessor support is broken after upgrade to 63 by bugzilla-noreply
14
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 235215] Bump LLVM_DEFAULT to 80 by bugzilla-noreply
28
by bugzilla-noreply
Problem reports for gecko@FreeBSD.org that need special attention by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 228855] www/firefox: crashes on opening of ebay.com by bugzilla-noreply
15
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 218188] www/firefox + SNDIO cannot reach 60fps without sndiod running by bugzilla-noreply
5
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 231491] www/firefox (62.0) built with DEBUG doesnt start by bugzilla-noreply
4
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 206351] www/firefox: menu and search broken by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 233591] mail/thunderbird has incorrect icon name in desktop file by bugzilla-noreply
4
by bugzilla-noreply
Problem reports for gecko@FreeBSD.org that need special attention by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
Firefox ESNI issue by Steve Wills-5
0
by Steve Wills-5
Problem reports for gecko@FreeBSD.org that need special attention by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
Problem reports for gecko@FreeBSD.org that need special attention by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239155] www/firefox: update to 69.0 (phase: Beta, ETA: 2019-09-03) by bugzilla-noreply
1
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238996] www/firefox by bugzilla-noreply
6
by bugzilla-noreply
Problem reports for gecko@FreeBSD.org that need special attention by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
www/seamonkey removed from ports by Christian Jachmann
1
by Jan Beich-5
[Bug 237803] www/seamonkey 2.49.4_26 fails to build by bugzilla-noreply
7
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 223774] www/seamonkey installs scores of duplicate files by bugzilla-noreply
2
by bugzilla-noreply
Problem reports for gecko@FreeBSD.org that need special attention by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
Re: Firefox and GTK2 by Jan Beich-5
6
by Jan Beich-5
FireFox + Pulseaudio is always using sink 0 instead of default sink(9 in my case) by Andreas Drewke
6
by Andreas Drewke
Problem reports for gecko@FreeBSD.org that need special attention by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
FireFox + Pulseaudio is always using sink 0 instead of default sink(9 in my case) by Andreas Drewke
0
by Andreas Drewke
[Bug 238639] devel/gn: maybe unusable by www/firefox by bugzilla-noreply
3
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 236651] www/firefox: update to 67.0 (currently, Beta phase) by bugzilla-noreply
19
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
Firefox and llvm by Mikhail T.-6
9
by Mikhail T.-6
Problem reports for gecko@FreeBSD.org that need special attention by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
N/A, hoping to chat by emily.h@onelocal.com
0
by emily.h@onelocal.com
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
1234 ... 41