FreeBSD › freebsd-gecko

freebsd-gecko

This forum is an archive for the mailing list freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org (more options) Messages posted here will be sent to this mailing list.
This is a forum about Gecko applications using FreeBSD. Discussion centers around Gecko Ports applications, their installation, their development and their support within FreeBSD.
New Topic
People
1234 ... 41
Topics (3682)
Replies Last Post Views
[Bug 239914] www/firefox: 11.3R: Firefox 68.0.1 ignores at least 2 prefs by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239914] www/firefox: 11.3R: Firefox 68.0.1 ignores at least 2 prefs by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 224471] [PATCH] bsd.gecko.mk: add conditional for ccache by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 224471] [PATCH] bsd.gecko.mk: add conditional for ccache by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 224471] [PATCH] bsd.gecko.mk: add conditional for ccache by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 232183] www/firefox: r481071 of Mk/bsd.gecko.mk inhibits the use of ccache by absolute pathnames by bugzilla-noreply
7
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 224471] [PATCH] bsd.gecko.mk: add conditional for ccache by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 224471] [PATCH] bsd.gecko.mk: add conditional for ccache by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239873] www/firefox and mail/thunderbird don't like the new ASLR "stackgap" feature by bugzilla-noreply
1
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238087] www/firefox: update to 68.0 (currently, Beta phase) by bugzilla-noreply
13
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 206980] www/firefox: 44.0 port build fails with WRKDIRPREFIX set by bugzilla-noreply
6
by bugzilla-noreply
16 августа ПРИГЛАШАЕМ ИЗДАТЬ ВАШУ СТАТЬЮ В В ТЕКУЩЕМ НОМЕРЕ by редакция журнала
0
by редакция журнала
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
Problem reports for gecko@FreeBSD.org that need special attention by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 235666] www/firefox fails to build with python-3.6 by bugzilla-noreply
5
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 232701] www/firefox multiprocessor support is broken after upgrade to 63 by bugzilla-noreply
14
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 235215] Bump LLVM_DEFAULT to 80 by bugzilla-noreply
28
by bugzilla-noreply
Problem reports for gecko@FreeBSD.org that need special attention by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 228855] www/firefox: crashes on opening of ebay.com by bugzilla-noreply
15
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 218188] www/firefox + SNDIO cannot reach 60fps without sndiod running by bugzilla-noreply
5
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 231491] www/firefox (62.0) built with DEBUG doesnt start by bugzilla-noreply
4
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 206351] www/firefox: menu and search broken by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 233591] mail/thunderbird has incorrect icon name in desktop file by bugzilla-noreply
4
by bugzilla-noreply
Problem reports for gecko@FreeBSD.org that need special attention by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
Firefox ESNI issue by Steve Wills-5
0
by Steve Wills-5
Problem reports for gecko@FreeBSD.org that need special attention by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
Problem reports for gecko@FreeBSD.org that need special attention by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 239155] www/firefox: update to 69.0 (phase: Beta, ETA: 2019-09-03) by bugzilla-noreply
1
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238996] www/firefox by bugzilla-noreply
6
by bugzilla-noreply
Problem reports for gecko@FreeBSD.org that need special attention by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
www/seamonkey removed from ports by Christian Jachmann
1
by Jan Beich-5
[Bug 237803] www/seamonkey 2.49.4_26 fails to build by bugzilla-noreply
7
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 223774] www/seamonkey installs scores of duplicate files by bugzilla-noreply
2
by bugzilla-noreply
Problem reports for gecko@FreeBSD.org that need special attention by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
Re: Firefox and GTK2 by Jan Beich-5
6
by Jan Beich-5
FireFox + Pulseaudio is always using sink 0 instead of default sink(9 in my case) by Andreas Drewke
6
by Andreas Drewke
Problem reports for gecko@FreeBSD.org that need special attention by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
FireFox + Pulseaudio is always using sink 0 instead of default sink(9 in my case) by Andreas Drewke
0
by Andreas Drewke
[Bug 238639] devel/gn: maybe unusable by www/firefox by bugzilla-noreply
3
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 236651] www/firefox: update to 67.0 (currently, Beta phase) by bugzilla-noreply
19
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
Firefox and llvm by Mikhail T.-6
9
by Mikhail T.-6
Problem reports for gecko@FreeBSD.org that need special attention by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] x11-fonts/fontconfig: Firefox print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE ("bitmap font by default") by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
N/A, hoping to chat by emily.h@onelocal.com
0
by emily.h@onelocal.com
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 238482] www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print pre-formatting is HORRIBLE by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
1234 ... 41
Free forum by Nabble Edit this page