Quantcast

freebsd-toolchain

This forum is an archive for the mailing list freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org (more options) Messages posted here will be sent to this mailing list.
This is the mailing list for discussions related to the maintenance of the toolchain that is shipped with FreeBSD. This could include the state of Clang and GCC, but also pieces of software such as assemblers, linkers and debuggers.
1234 ... 8
Topics (710)
Replies Last Post Views
[Bug 213732] lang/beignet: crashes with some OpenCL apps by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 213732] lang/beignet: crashes with some OpenCL apps by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 213732] lang/beignet: crashes with some OpenCL apps by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216707] exp-run: Update lang/gcc from GCC 4.9 to GCC 5 by bugzilla-noreply
51
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 214904] head -r309179 clang 3.9.0 TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64 buildkernel stops for: rejected assembler notation in hwpmc_e500.c by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 217736] addr2line incorrectly resolves filename/lineno/function by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 217736] addr2line incorrectly resolves filename/lineno/function by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 217736] addr2line incorrectly resolves filename/lineno/function by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 214971] clang + lld 3.9.1: Unhandled relocation 1031 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 217753] lld [llvm 4.0.0] Linker won't link on aarch64 (Error: Failed to open a.out) by bugzilla-noreply
1
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 214258] devel/openmp: spurious libm dependency by bugzilla-noreply
13
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 217736] addr2line incorrectly resolves filename/lineno/function by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 217736] addr2line incorrectly resolves filename/lineno/function by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
FYI: what it takes for RAM+swap to build devel/llvm40 with 4 processors or cores and WITH__DEBUG= (powerpc64 example) by Mark Millard-2
0
by Mark Millard-2
[Bug 217648] [lld 4.0.0] WITH_LLD_IS_LD Results by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 217648] [lld 4.0.0] WITH_LLD_IS_LD Results by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 215969] c++ compiler regression by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 215969] c++ compiler regression by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 215969] c++ compiler regression by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 215969] c++ compiler regression by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 215969] c++ compiler regression by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
FYI: clang 4.0 vs. 3.9.1 system compiler for powerpc64 and powerpc: same problems for what I've looked at so far by Mark Millard-2
0
by Mark Millard-2
[Bug 215969] c++ compiler regression by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
FYI: Going from head -r313864 to -r313999 I had to rebuild virtualbox-ose-additions 5.1.14 by Mark Millard-2
0
by Mark Millard-2
arm64 libc.so.7.full link: Are the 8 "R_AARCH64_ABS64 used with TLS symbol . . ." notices a problem? by Mark Millard-2
1
by Mark Linimon-2
[Bug 216908] security/gnutls: does not build on 12-CURRENT aarch64 after llvm 3.9 toolchain integration by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216908] security/gnutls: does not build on 12-CURRENT aarch64 after llvm 3.9 toolchain integration by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
How to get a crosscompile toolchain for aarch64 for use in poudriere[?] by Meyer, Wolfgang
5
by Meyer, Wolfgang
[Bug 216903] clang frontend command failed due to signal by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216903] clang frontend command failed due to signal by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216908] security/gnutls: does not build on 12-CURRENT aarch64 after llvm 3.9 toolchain integration by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216908] security/gnutls: does not build on 12-CURRENT aarch64 after llvm 3.9 toolchain integration by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
clang 4.0.0 with_lld_is_ld build by Shawn Webb-3
3
by Ed Maste-2
[Bug 216908] security/gnutls: does not build on 12-CURRENT aarch64 after llvm 3.9 toolchain integration by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216080] science/bddsolve: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216080] science/bddsolve: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216908] security/gnutls: does not build on 12-CURRENT aarch64 after llvm 3.9 toolchain integration by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216878] BSD readelf -d output is slightly incompatible with GNU readelf by bugzilla-noreply
5
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 215107] head -r309656 clang 3.9.0 for TARGET_ARCH=powerpc: -mminimal-toc rejected (missing llvm 19098 fix?) by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216587] cc should accept -pie argument by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216587] cc should accept -pie argument by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216587] cc should accept -pie argument by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216587] cc should accept -pie argument by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216590] clang 3.9.1 from (e.g.) head -r312942 fails to reject or even warn about some forms of assignments to const fields by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
A C error that clang 3.9.1 did not catch while generating mlx5_en_ethtool.o (amd64-xtoolchain-gcc's amd64-gcc did catch it) by Mark Millard-2
1
by Mark Millard-2
head -r312942: install: link /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/.../boot/dtb/am3335x-bone.dtb -> /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/.../boot/dtb/beaglebone.dtb: No such file or directory by Mark Millard-2
2
by Oleksandr Tymoshenko...
GCC i386 stack misalignment: [package - head-i386-default][graphics/rawtherapee-devel] Failed for rawtherapee-devel-5.0 in stage by Matthias Andree-2
1
by Dimitry Andric-4
lld and powerpc (32-bit, not powerpc64): What is FreeBSD's intent for head and going forward? by Mark Millard-2
0
by Mark Millard-2
=mcpu=cortex-a7 buildlworld (for example) vs. __aeabi_uidiv use in ports from pkg by Mark Millard-2
1
by Ian Lepore-3
Re: 3.9.1's lld and powerpc64 for -pie use: can't create dynamic relocation R_PPC64_REL24 against readonly segment by Mark Millard-2
0
by Mark Millard-2
[Bug 214971] clang + lld 3.9.1: Unhandled relocation 1031 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216451] Assertion failed: (NodeToMatch->getOpcode() != ISD::DELETED_NODE && "NodeToMatch was removed partway through selection"), function SelectCodeCommon, file /usr/src/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp, line 3387 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216451] Assertion failed: (NodeToMatch->getOpcode() != ISD::DELETED_NODE && "NodeToMatch was removed partway through selection"), function SelectCodeCommon, file /usr/src/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp, line 3387 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216451] Assertion failed: (NodeToMatch->getOpcode() != ISD::DELETED_NODE && "NodeToMatch was removed partway through selection"), function SelectCodeCommon, file /usr/src/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp, line 3387 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216451] Assertion failed: (NodeToMatch->getOpcode() != ISD::DELETED_NODE && "NodeToMatch was removed partway through selection"), function SelectCodeCommon, file /usr/src/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp, line 3387 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216451] Assertion failed: (NodeToMatch->getOpcode() != ISD::DELETED_NODE && "NodeToMatch was removed partway through selection"), function SelectCodeCommon, file /usr/src/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp, line 3387 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[clang/lld 4.0.0 arm64] link failure in sys/boot/efi/loader by Shawn Webb-3
1
by Dimitry Andric-4
[Bug 216316] objcopy in 11 appears to have a regression compared to the version in 10 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216229] head: (e.g. -r312009): kernel-toolchain: bootstrap-tools stage libllvmminimal can fail for lack of -I options (e.g., from scratch kernel-toolchain) by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 214971] clang + lld 3.9.1: Unhandled relocation 1031 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216229] head: (e.g. -r312009): kernel-toolchain: bootstrap-tools stage libllvmminimal can fail for lack of -I options (e.g., from scratch kernel-toolchain) by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216316] objcopy in 11 appears to have a regression compared to the version in 10 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216080] science/bddsolve: fails to build with lang/gcc6 or later by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216080] science/bddsolve: fails to build with libc++ 4.0 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
I have submitted llvm bugzilla 31716 for lld 3.9.1's incoherent .plt vs. .got.plt content for powerpc64 by Mark Millard-2
0
by Mark Millard-2
/usr/bin/ld.lld on powerpc64: produces a.out for which: ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/powerpc64/reloc.c:374 by Mark Millard-2
30
by Mark Millard-2
[Bug 216316] objcopy in 11 appears to have a regression compared to the version in 10 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216316] objcopy in 11 appears to have a regression compared to the version in 10 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
elfdump doesn't support .a files? by Ngie Cooper (yaneura...
1
by Ed Maste-2
Bug 216229 - head: (e.g. -r312009): kernel-toolchain: bootstrap-tools stage libllvmminimal can fail for lack of -I options by Mark Millard-2
0
by Mark Millard-2
clang 3.9.0 buildkernel on old powerpc64's vs. trying to build hwpmc_e500.o and the like. . . by Mark Millard-2
31
by Justin Hibbits-3
[Bug 216166] graphics/gegl3: clang 4.0 crashes during build by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216166] graphics/gegl3: clang 4.0 crashes during build by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216166] graphics/gegl3: clang 4.0 crashes during build by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216117] clang 4.0.0 crashes trying to build lld on i386 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216117] clang 4.0.0 crashes trying to build lld on i386 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216117] clang 4.0.0 crashes trying to build lld on i386 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216117] clang 4.0.0 crashes trying to build lld on i386 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216117] clang 4.0.0 crashes trying to build lld on i386 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216117] devel/llvm39: clang crashes trying to build lld on i386 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216117] devel/llvm39: clang crashes trying to build lld on i386 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216117] devel/llvm39: clang crashes trying to build lld on i386 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216117] devel/llvm39: clang crashes trying to build lld on i386 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
qemu-arm-static appears to have problems with signal delivery during (at least) poudrirer-devel based cross builds of some ports with ALLOW_MAKE_JOBS=yes by Mark Millard-2
1
by Mark Millard-2
[Bug 216080] science/bddsolve: fails to build with libc++ 4.0 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216080] science/bddsolve: fails to build with libc++ 4.0 by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 215969] c++ compiler regression by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 216012] /usr/lib/libgcc_s.so underlinks libc after r308308 by bugzilla-noreply
2
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 215969] c++ compiler regression by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
[Bug 215969] c++ compiler regression by bugzilla-noreply
0
by bugzilla-noreply
1234 ... 8