gnupg and gnupg2

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

gnupg and gnupg2

David Mehler
Hello,

I've got a 10.3 system. I just noticed I've got both gnupg 1.4 and
gnupg 2.0. My question is can I get rid of gnupg1 and use the gnupg2?

Thanks.
Dave.
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: gnupg and gnupg2

Jim Ohlstein
They're both ports, not part of base. Evidently you have at least one port that relies on each.

Jim Ohlstein

On Apr 20, 2017, 8:27 PM -0400, David Mehler <[hidden email]>, wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I've got a 10.3 system. I just noticed I've got both gnupg 1.4 and
> gnupg 2.0. My question is can I get rid of gnupg1 and use the gnupg2?
>
> Thanks.
> Dave.
> _______________________________________________
> [hidden email] mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: gnupg and gnupg2

Gerard
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:46:58 -0400, Jim Ohlstein stated:
 
> On Apr 20, 2017, 8:27 PM -0400, David Mehler <[hidden email]>,
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've got a 10.3 system. I just noticed I've got both gnupg 1.4 and
> > gnupg 2.0. My question is can I get rid of gnupg1 and use the
> > gnupg2?

> They're both ports, not part of base. Evidently you have at least one
> port that relies on each.

Perhaps running "pkg info -r gnupg20"

and "pkg info -r gnupg1" might help.

Actually, the latest version in port is "gnupg-2.1.20" You might be
able to remove the other two versions and just link to that one.

--
Carmel
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: gnupg and gnupg2

David Mehler
Hello,

Thanks. Here's the output. Can I get clamav-unofficial-sigs to link
against gnupg and not gnupg1? Is this something the port should do?

pkg info -r gnupg
gnupg-2.1.20:
        spamassassin-3.4.1_10

pkg info -r gnupg1
gnupg1-1.4.21_3:
        clamav-unofficial-sigs-5.3.2_1

Thanks.
Dave.


On 4/21/17, Gerard Seibert <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:46:58 -0400, Jim Ohlstein stated:
>
>> On Apr 20, 2017, 8:27 PM -0400, David Mehler <[hidden email]>,
>> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I've got a 10.3 system. I just noticed I've got both gnupg 1.4 and
>> > gnupg 2.0. My question is can I get rid of gnupg1 and use the
>> > gnupg2?
>
>> They're both ports, not part of base. Evidently you have at least one
>> port that relies on each.
>
> Perhaps running "pkg info -r gnupg20"
>
> and "pkg info -r gnupg1" might help.
>
> Actually, the latest version in port is "gnupg-2.1.20" You might be
> able to remove the other two versions and just link to that one.
>
> --
> Carmel
> _______________________________________________
> [hidden email] mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "[hidden email]"
>
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: gnupg and gnupg2

Jim Ohlstein
Hello,

On 4/21/17 2:30 PM, David Mehler wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Thanks. Here's the output. Can I get clamav-unofficial-sigs to link
> against gnupg and not gnupg1? Is this something the port should do?
>
> pkg info -r gnupg
> gnupg-2.1.20:
>         spamassassin-3.4.1_10
>
> pkg info -r gnupg1
> gnupg1-1.4.21_3:
>         clamav-unofficial-sigs-5.3.2_1

It looks like the option is to build mail/spamassassin with either or
neither (note that one or the other seems to be required for updates).
If you build your own, you can alter the configuration of
mail/spamassassin using 'make config'.


>
> On 4/21/17, Gerard Seibert <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:46:58 -0400, Jim Ohlstein stated:
>>
>>> On Apr 20, 2017, 8:27 PM -0400, David Mehler <[hidden email]>,
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I've got a 10.3 system. I just noticed I've got both gnupg 1.4 and
>>>> gnupg 2.0. My question is can I get rid of gnupg1 and use the
>>>> gnupg2?
>>
>>> They're both ports, not part of base. Evidently you have at least one
>>> port that relies on each.
>>
>> Perhaps running "pkg info -r gnupg20"
>>
>> and "pkg info -r gnupg1" might help.
>>
>> Actually, the latest version in port is "gnupg-2.1.20" You might be
>> able to remove the other two versions and just link to that one.
>>
>> --
>> Carmel


--
Jim Ohlstein


"Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the
difference." - Mark Twain
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: gnupg and gnupg2

Herbert J. Skuhra-7
In reply to this post by David Mehler
David Mehler skrev:

>
> Hello,
> Thanks. Here's the output. Can I get clamav-unofficial-sigs to link
> against gnupg and not gnupg1? Is this something the port should do?
>
> pkg info -r gnupg
> gnupg-2.1.20:
>         spamassassin-3.4.1_10
>
> pkg info -r gnupg1
> gnupg1-1.4.21_3:
>         clamav-unofficial-sigs-5.3.2_1

The clamav-unoffical-sigs port depends on security/gnupg which is
gnupg-2.1.20. Try 'pkg delete -f gnupg1' and then reinstall
clamav-unofficial-sigs.

--
Herbert
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: gnupg and gnupg2

David Mehler
Hello Herbert,

Thank you. That fixed the problem.

Thanks.
Dave.


On 4/22/17, Herbert J. Skuhra <[hidden email]> wrote:

> David Mehler skrev:
>>
>> Hello,
>> Thanks. Here's the output. Can I get clamav-unofficial-sigs to link
>> against gnupg and not gnupg1? Is this something the port should do?
>>
>> pkg info -r gnupg
>> gnupg-2.1.20:
>>         spamassassin-3.4.1_10
>>
>> pkg info -r gnupg1
>> gnupg1-1.4.21_3:
>>         clamav-unofficial-sigs-5.3.2_1
>
> The clamav-unoffical-sigs port depends on security/gnupg which is
> gnupg-2.1.20. Try 'pkg delete -f gnupg1' and then reinstall
> clamav-unofficial-sigs.
>
> --
> Herbert
> _______________________________________________
> [hidden email] mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "[hidden email]"
>
_______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[hidden email]"
Loading...